I think this will be good for the university. It's time to get a solid winning program in our refurbished stadium facility competing at full blown Div I level.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
Last I heard they were still in the coach searching process.
"The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe." ~Dr. Leonard H. McCoy
Anyone know if SIU is simply filling a Title 9 requirement? If that's the case I see this being underfunded and yet another program with 0 expectations from the AD. IF SIU truly intends to compete, then the expectation is to fund the program appropriately and win conference championships. I realize this isn't off the ground yet, but I think Tommy needs to get this off on the right foot.
If they bring in Women's soccer along with dropping football we could then cancel a bunch of women's sports.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
If they bring in Women's soccer along with dropping football we could then cancel a bunch of women's sports.
No, they couldn't cancel any women's sports
If they bring in Women's soccer along with dropping football we could then cancel a bunch of women's sports.
No, they couldn't cancel any women's sports
If football went away, then they'd literally have to cancel a lot of women's sports to offset that loss of male scholorships.
http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/inclusion/title-ix-frequently-asked-questions#how
An institution must meet all of the following requirements in order to be in compliance with Title IX:
- For participation requirements, institutions officials must meet one of the following three tests. An institution may:
- Provide participation opportunities for women and men that are substantially proportionate to their respective rates of enrollment of full-time undergraduate students;
- Demonstrate a history and continuing practice of program expansion for the underrepresented sex;
- Fully and effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex; and,
- Female and male student-athletes must receive athletics scholarship dollars proportional to their participation; and,
- Equal treatment of female and male student-athletes in the eleven provisions as mentioned above.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
I understand how Title IX works, however you failed to point out the fact that Division One schools must sponsor 7 men's and 7 women's sports minimum. (Or 6 for men & 8 for women.)
I understand how Title IX works, however you failed to point out the fact that Division One schools must sponsor 7 men's and 7 women's sports minimum. (Or 6 for men & 8 for women.)
That's a pretty dumb rule.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
I understand how Title IX works, however you failed to point out the fact that Division One schools must sponsor 7 men's and 7 women's sports minimum. (Or 6 for men & 8 for women.)
That's a pretty dumb rule.
Common sense is overrated sometimes..... 😀
I understand how Title IX works, however you failed to point out the fact that Division One schools must sponsor 7 men's and 7 women's sports minimum. (Or 6 for men & 8 for women.)
That's a pretty dumb rule.
Common sense is overrated sometimes..... 😀
That rules seems a little corrupt (perhaps even like racketeering) to me with an intent to leverage many schools into unwanted programs.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
I understand how Title IX works, however you failed to point out the fact that Division One schools must sponsor 7 men's and 7 women's sports minimum. (Or 6 for men & 8 for women.)
That's a pretty dumb rule.
Common sense is overrated sometimes..... 😀
That rules seems a little corrupt (perhaps even like racketeering) to me with an intent to leverage many schools into unwanted programs.
So the ncaa telling schools, to be able to have an "athletic department" they need to offer more than 1-2 sports is corrupt? (Esentislly what you're saying). Quite the analysis.
I understand how Title IX works, however you failed to point out the fact that Division One schools must sponsor 7 men's and 7 women's sports minimum. (Or 6 for men & 8 for women.)
That's a pretty dumb rule.
Common sense is overrated sometimes..... 😀
That rules seems a little corrupt (perhaps even like racketeering) to me with an intent to leverage many schools into unwanted programs.
So the ncaa telling schools, to be able to have an "athletic department" they need to offer more than 1-2 sports is corrupt? (Esentislly what you're saying). Quite the analysis.
Telling them it's 14 sports or nothing is crooked as crap.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
There's nothing crooked about it. That's the minimum expectation to participate.
Morris - Your arguement keeps changing everytime someone points out that you don't know what you are talking about. Check your sexist attitude at the door please.
Craving a McBride Special!
Morris - Your arguement keeps changing everytime someone points out that you don't know what you are talking about. Check your sexist attitude at the door please.
The intricacies of gender politics and the corruption of the NCAA is hard to keep up with.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
― Ayn Rand
