Last seen: January 20, 2025 3:30 pm
Exactly. The idea that this is all on Lane is ludicrous. Absurd.
This is great: I highly approve. Can we afford this? I really wanted Mullins to succeed, mostly because I liked his idea of "culture." But he ut...
@fraydog Lane has done better work than any of his predessors in recent memory. Great point.
@barkeep-1967 Sorry, but I don't understand. Seriously, I don't know what you mean.
@sandman95 I don't buy it either: that rumor has nothing that tracks with the personality of Bryan Mullins.
@johnny-utah Yes, I get that. But it means one of two things: a couple of dismal years--which are just miserable for building fan support--while...
@barkeep-1967 Oh great. At least we can afford him, I guess . . . My problem with the firing is this: for the money we can pay, who the eff is go...
@sandman95 This is so true. I don't think you even need to qualify it with "an argument can be made."
Agree with all of this; that was exactly how I felt about hiring him. Maybe a more apt comparison than Belichick would be Porter Moser . . .
This is just all so sickeningly depressing.
I don't want Mullins to be canned.. I'm not happy with the results on the floor, but there are some intangibles, notably the quality of kids he brings...
And as far back as the pasting of St. Louis, other posters and I predicted that X would be gassed by season's end. And here we are. But wait! He...
That was shitty. That game was over with a couple of minutes left, and he couldn't put them in for some token time?
At the risk of having brickbats thrown my way . . . Just curious: did anyone besides me think that Dan Muller was good with his color work on ESPN+ ...
@kyle_saluki_17 Thanks for this! I'm so confused at this point.